Shopping cart Shopping cartLog in / Register | Pressroom
Your shopping cart is empty
Home About Us Study Programs WOF TV WOF Radio Written Word Catholicism Series News Ambassador Store Contact Donate end cap
Written Word > Articles & Commentaries > August 2009 > Pope Benedict and the Logic of Gratuity
Current rating: 5 (1 ratings)


Pope Benedict and the Logic of Gratuity

By Rev. Robert Barron

One of the most intriguing—and original—ideas in Pope Benedict’s recent encyclical on the social order is that the ethics of obligation and mutuality have to be supplemented by an ethic of gratuity.  By an ethic of mutuality he means the moral logic that obtains in the marketplace, whereby people, according to the terms of a contract, give in order to receive something in return.  So you pay me a certain amount, and I provide certain goods and services to you.  This is the essence of what the Catholic tradition calls commutative justice, the fair play among the various members of a society or economic community.  By an ethic of obligation, he means the moral logic that obtains within the political arena, whereby people are compelled by law to give to others in order to realize distributive justice, or a fairer allotting of the total goods of a society.  For example, through taxation, one is obliged to transfer some of one’s wealth to the government for the sake of the common good.  Now the Pope insists that these two types of giving are essential to the right ordering of any human community; we should never, he thinks, fall short of them, preferring injustice to justice.  Nevertheless, they must be complemented, leavened if you will, by a more radical type of giving, what he terms the ethic of gratuity.  According to this mode, one gives, not because he is contractually obligated or legally compelled to give, but simply because it is good so to do.  This is the kind of giving that mimics most fully the divine manner of giving.  The God who made the universe ex nihilo could never, even in principle, have done so out of contractual or legal obligation.  He received nothing in return for creation, and nothing outside of his own will could ever have compelled him to create.  He gave of himself and let the world be simply because it was good to do so. 

Without the presence of sheerly graceful or gratuitous giving, the Pope contends, even a just society will become, in time, cold and less than fully human.  There is an interesting parallel here with the moral life.  In traditional Catholic  theology, justice is recognized as a natural virtue, that is to say, a form of excellence that can exist apart from divine grace and that can be appreciated even by unelevated human reason.  But love is a theological or properly supernatural virtue, which can come only through a participation in the divine life.  The just person is morally praiseworthy, admirable, a gentleman; but the person of love is a saint.  And without love, even natural justice can devolve into calculation and gamesmanship, a play of tit for tat. 

So far, you might say, so abstract.  But I think we can show that the Pope’s principle plays out very concretely in history.  In 1945, Germany lay in ruins, devastated by the wicked behavior of its leaders.  Many in the west felt that, in justice, a harsh peace should be imposed on the defeated nation, but Secretary of State George Marshall and President Harry Truman decided that a merciful response was called for.  They implemented what came to be known as the Marshall Plan, a comprehensive effort to rebuild German society and restore the German people to dignity.  Though one might cynically suggest pragmatic motives for this policy, I think Winston Churchill had it right when he called the Marshall Plan “the most unsordid act in history.”  A logic of strict justice would have dictated a punitive response to the nation that had caused so much misery; Truman and Marshall intuited that in the wake of the calamity of the world war, a logic of gratuity was more appropriate. 

African Americans had, by the 1950’s, endured two hundred years of slavery, oppression, discrimination, and segregation.  In strict justice, they could claim a right to defend themselves, even through violence, and to demand various forms of compensation for years of abuse.  Figures such as Malcolm X and James Baldwin militated for this kind of justice.  But Martin Luther King, who fully acknowledged the deep injustice that blacks had suffered, nevertheless advocated the path of non-violence and reconciliation, exercising toward mainstream America thereby a logic of gratuity.  And it was precisely this approach that proved so practically transformative. 

In ancient Israel, there was the custom of celebrating, every fifty years, a year of Jubilee, during which all debts were cancelled.  The Jubilee gave hope to those who had labored under the weight of debilitating financial obligations.  This wiping clean of the economic slate was, in the strict sense, a violation of justice, but it was a prime example of the logic of gratuity and a conscious imitation of the generosity of God.  Just a few years ago, Pope John Paul II called for a revival of the Biblical Jubilee in regard to third world countries who were saddled with enormous debt toward the nations of the developed world.  Under the weight of this obligation, these economies, the Pope saw, couldn’t develop and expand.  And so he urged the wealthier societies to wipe away the debt and give the poorer peoples a clean slate.  Bankers and investors in the first world balked, of course, at this violation of justice, but the Pope insisted that, given the gravity of the situation, only the logic of gratuity would conduce toward an economic renewal in underdeveloped nations. 

And so, Pope Benedict teaches, we must never fail to meet the demands of justice, but at the same time, we must never remain the prisoners of mere justice.  According to the Christian vision, justice must be leavened by love, and equity complemented by gratuity.

Posted: 8/22/2009 4:41:53 PM by Word On Fire | with 1 comments
Filed under: encyclical, PopeBenedict


Comments
Jack
Thank you for this very fine essay on this important encyclical. I would only add one point. "According to this mode, one gives, not because he is contractually obligated or legally compelled to give, but simply because it is good so to do. This is the kind of giving that mimics most fully the divine manner of giving." As true as that is, I think it is perhaps important to recognize that the "Logic of Gratuity" compels us to give not so much because it is good to do so, which it certainly is, but because we have first been given so much. Our giving is thus more like the Son than like the Father. Or more like Mary's. It is not out of our abundance that we give, but out of our poverty.
9/12/2009 9:23:06 AM
Report abuse

Share with your friends

Add to DeliciousAdd to DiggAdd to NewsvineAdd to RedditAdd to Yahoo MyWebAdd to FarkAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to StumbleUponAdd to Google BookmarksAdd to MySpace

Title

Click on the title of any of Fr. Barron's Articles on the left to view the full article.  Please feel free to provide your own comments and feedback. Clicking any of the Tags below will show you a listing of articles and commentaries that relate to the word you click. Click on the RSS link to sign up to be notified of each new item that is published here. Past articles can be found in the archive.

WOF Blog RSS Feed SubscriptionSubscribe to our RSS Feed to receive new articles

Tags

2012 A Man For All Seasons A Serious Man abortion Adjustment Bureau Adolph Eichmann advent agnostic Agora Alister angels and deomons apocalypse apologetics Archdiocese of Chicago Ascension atheism Audacity of Hope baptism Barack Obama big bang theory Bin Laden Bob Dylan book Book of Job Brad Caritas in Veritate Carol Marin Catholic Universities celibacy Charles Lwanga Chicago childfree marriages children Christopher Hitchens Civilta Cattolica Coen Brothers commentariat confession conscience contraception devil District 9 dysfunctional Eckhart Tolle Einstein Elijah Emmaus encyclical encyclicals ends and means Evangelization exorcism Father Andrew Greeley Father Barron films financial Fr. Paul Murray Genesis Georgetown golf Hannah Hannah Arendt Hell heresies holocaust interviews Ireland Judge Judy judgement Julia Roberts Kenneth Clark Kierkegaard Laurie Brink Liberal Catholicism Libya lord of the world Lumen Fidei Man of Steel marriage McGrath Mother Teresa movie review muslim nazi nones Notre Dame Nuns Of Gods and Men Palm Sunday PBS Pentecost Peter Snow Pew Forum philosophy Pitt Political Corruption Pope Benedict Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II priest pro life prosperity gospel protestantism Purgatory Ralph Grimston Richard McBrien robert hugh benson sacraments Samuel science scientism Sears Tower September 11th sex abuse sexuality Shari’a Law Simon Cowell spiritual St. Irenaeus St. John St. Patrick St. Thomas Aquinas St. Thomas More Superman Ted Kennedy The Hunger Games The Ides of March the shack The Stoning of Soraya M. theologian Time Magazine Timothy Dolan tolerance True Grit Twilight vampires Vatican Willis Tower Woody Allen World War Z World Youth Day YouTube

Syndication

RSS
WORD ON FIRE CATHOLIC MINISTRIES | 5215 Old Orchard Road Suite 410 | Skokie, IL 60077
Add to DeliciousAdd to DiggAdd to NewsvineAdd to RedditAdd to Yahoo MyWebAdd to FarkAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to StumbleUponAdd to Google BookmarksAdd to MySpace
Copyright © 2010 WordOnFire.org