Shopping cart Shopping cartLog in / Register | Pressroom
Your shopping cart is empty
Home About Us Study Programs WOF TV WOF Radio Written Word Catholicism Series News Ambassador Store Contact Donate end cap
Written Word > Articles & Commentaries > March 2009 > Ends and Means and the Audacity to Hope
Current rating: 4.5 (4 ratings)


Barack Obama The Audacity of HopeEnds and Means and the Audacity to Hope
By Rev. Robert Barron





Somehow during the long campaign season, I never got around to reading Barack Obama’s The Audacity of Hope.  In recent weeks, two very bright friends of mine—and not political supporters of the president—rather warmly recommended the book to me. So just a few days ago, in preparation for a long plane trip, I bought The Audacity of Hope at the airport and read it en route. I saw clearly why my friends thought highly of the book, for there is much to admire in it. It is gracefully and persuasively written, revealing on practically every page the considerably charming, reflective, and intelligent character of its author. Obama has many insightful things to say about polarization in government, the dangers of our money-driven political culture, the evolution of the Democrat-Republican debate in the years following the roiled sixties, the similarities between Reagan and Clinton—and much else. And his tone throughout the book is optimistic, uplifting, and inspiring. 

One of the chapters of The Audacity of Hope is concerned with the Constitution, and I confess that I turned to it with special interest, given the fact that Obama had been for some years a professor of constitutional law at the University of Chicago. The President shows that the peculiar genius of Madison, Jay, and the other framers lay in their establishment of a system of checks and balances, a deliberate pitting of conflicting interests and factions against one another so as to produce, through a lengthy process of debate and argument, a rough practical consensus. Precisely in this, they saw, would violent domination by any one party or set of interests be precluded. Obama sings the praises of this rough-and-tumble, pragmatic process, identifying it as a uniquely American contribution to political philosophy and praxis.  So far, so good. But then comes this rather startling line: “Implicit…in the very idea of ordered liberty was a rejection of absolute truth, the infallibility of any idea or ideology or theology…” And a page later, this: “The rejection of absolutism…has encouraged the very process…that allows us to make better, if not perfect, choices, not only about the means to our ends, but also about the ends themselves.” This pragmatism even about ultimate ends allows us, Obama continues, to escape “the cruelties of the Inquisition, the pogrom, the gulag, or the jihad.” I’m afraid that this is where I felt obliged to get off the train. 

I completely share the President’s enthusiasm for deliberative pragmatism and creative checking and balancing in regard to the nuts and bolts of practical governance. But when he allows what is legitimate at that level to hold sway at the level of the moral structure of a political system, he points the country down a short road to chaos. Both John Paul II and Benedict XVI have vigorously defended the democratic form of government, but both Popes have also reminded us that a representative democracy must be grounded in certain definite ethical principles, lest it devolve into license, disordered freedom. Members of a democracy can debate all they want about the best means of achieving their moral ends, but if the ends themselves become the subject of debate, the system implodes. Indeed, one of the surest signs that one has fudged this distinction is the tendency to characterize those who hold to moral absolutes as “jihadists” or purveyors of  “Inquisitions.”
 
Now here’s what’s really puzzling: I think Obama agrees with me!  As the chapter on the constitution unfolds, we can, as it were, see into the worried workings of his lawyerly mind. Having made his vigorous argument for deliberative pragmatism at all levels, he draws back, recalling the examples of William Lloyd Garrison, Frederick Douglass, Harriet Tubman, and John Brown during the period just prior to the Civil War. Those impassioned abolitionists did not think that the deep immorality of slavery was a matter for debate or pragmatic compromise. They were, for want of a better word, absolutists on the subject, and yet they all participated in different ways and to varying degrees, in the democratic system. And it was their principled, uncompromising convictions that led to changes in our country without which Barack Obama’s emergence on the public stage would have been unthinkable. It leads him to this conclusion: “I am robbed even of the certainty of uncertainty—for sometimes absolute truths may well be absolute.” Quite so, Mr. President, but you can’t have it both ways. 

All of which conduces to the issue which oddly haunts The Audacity of Hope:  abortion. Obama addresses the question of abortion directly in his chapter on faith, but it is surprising just how frequently he mentions it, obliquely and tangentially, throughout his book. If I might risk a bit of arm-chair psychologizing, it is a subject that clearly preoccupies him, bugs him. And it does so, I would argue, precisely because it lies on the fault-line in his thinking that I’ve just identified. The direct killing of the innocent is, like slavery or racial discrimination, one of those absolute intrinsic evils, the avoidance of which constitutes the moral framework of any decent human society. One ought no more to deliberate about the rectitude of killing the innocent than to debate the legitimacy of holding other human beings as property. 

It is only when we have real moral clarity about ends and means that we might have the audacity to hope for a just society.  
Posted: 3/24/2009 11:08:36 AM by Word On Fire Admin | with 5 comments
Filed under: abortion, AudacityofHope, BarackObama, book, endsandmeans


Comments
M.Garmon
Allen C. Guelzo says "Society shuns moral absolutism, but it does not shun all moral absolutes That is why Abraham Lincoln did not shun them 150 years ago."
4/26/2009 11:49:16 AM
Report abuse

Kell Brigan
"One ought no more to deliberate about the rectitude of killing the innocent than to debate the legitimacy of holding other human beings as property."

Can we add, "The right of the individual to make his or her own medical decisions free from nagging, stigmatization, insult, threat of deadly force (i.e. "euthanasia") or economic blackmail from the State" to the list of intrinsic goods? One of my most fervent, and literal, prayers right now is that I don't end my life as a victim of murder. The holocaust was less than 100 years ago; I think it's entirely possible Obama and his legacy rulers will eventually move to, or try to move to, the wholesale murder of fat people, the elderly, and most people with disabilities. I am truly, absolutely terrified that Obama may devolve into a classic Dictator.
8/22/2009 2:21:25 PM
Report abuse

C Rodriguez
In response to Kell Brigan regarding President Obama's health care initiative as "the wholesale murder of fat people, the elderly, and most people with disabilities" - Please! President Obama does not want people to be killed off because they are fat, old or disabled. However, he does want those who are considered "bad risks" to be allowed to have adequate and affordable health insurance to help them deal with the medical issues that arise from being fat, old and/or disabled. I, for one, hope that a strong health care bill is enacted to help all Americans (rich or poor, young or old, fat or thin, disabled or not) to have equal access to the health care that is in my estimation a right not a priviledge.
12/14/2009 6:39:20 PM
Report abuse

Mark Gonzales
Obama, like most presidents, struggles to do the best he can for our country. His American legal education tells him that any side can be argued, and that the Truth cannot be known.

He is like me because he knows that Cromwell, however pragmagtic, did little to help his country. In contract, Sir (Saint) Thomas More is a hero who stood up for what is right. It's ironic both were executed, but only one stands as a hero, as a saint.

We need to further our cause for the abolition of abortion and make it an issue to be addressed... it is only then we will find out if Obama truly is a hero.
2/22/2011 1:12:43 PM
Report abuse

Kathy
Abortion is a doubled edged sword. Once it becomes illegal again, women will abort through illegal means. I once thought if a woman was raped, by her own father, brother, uncle, etc., I could well understand the need for legalized abortion. Now, I think the emotional and spiritual scars of the abortion itself, the act of murder, would be far worse to endure. But Catholicism lagged behind, continues to drag it's feet, in education, in birth control, and wise councel. Adolescents and adults have left the Church, continue to leave, because Catholicism itself did not take up it's task of defining the dignity of women. It takes two to conceive, and perhaps we just didn't write our own book of HOPE, based on The Holy Scriptures. Not only hope for the unborn, but hope for the women who endured, and continue to endure stoning. God speed!
7/3/2011 4:45:21 PM
Report abuse

Share with your friends

Add to DeliciousAdd to DiggAdd to NewsvineAdd to RedditAdd to Yahoo MyWebAdd to FarkAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to StumbleUponAdd to Google BookmarksAdd to MySpace

Title

Click on the title of any of Fr. Barron's Articles on the left to view the full article.  Please feel free to provide your own comments and feedback. Clicking any of the Tags below will show you a listing of articles and commentaries that relate to the word you click. Click on the RSS link to sign up to be notified of each new item that is published here. Past articles can be found in the archive.

WOF Blog RSS Feed SubscriptionSubscribe to our RSS Feed to receive new articles

Tags

2012 A Man For All Seasons A Serious Man abortion Adjustment Bureau Adolph Eichmann advent agnostic Agora Alister angels and deomons apocalypse apologetics Archdiocese of Chicago Ascension atheism Audacity of Hope baptism Barack Obama big bang theory Bin Laden Bob Dylan book Book of Job Brad Caritas in Veritate Carol Marin Catholic Universities celibacy Charles Lwanga Chicago childfree marriages children Christopher Hitchens Civilta Cattolica Coen Brothers commentariat confession conscience contraception devil District 9 dysfunctional Eckhart Tolle Einstein Elijah Emmaus encyclical encyclicals ends and means Evangelization exorcism Father Andrew Greeley Father Barron films financial Fr. Paul Murray Genesis Georgetown golf Hannah Hannah Arendt Hell heresies holocaust interviews Ireland Judge Judy judgement Julia Roberts Kenneth Clark Kierkegaard Laurie Brink Liberal Catholicism Libya lord of the world Lumen Fidei Man of Steel marriage McGrath Mother Teresa movie review muslim nazi nones Notre Dame Nuns Of Gods and Men Palm Sunday PBS Pentecost Peter Snow Pew Forum philosophy Pitt Political Corruption Pope Benedict Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II priest pro life prosperity gospel protestantism Purgatory Ralph Grimston Richard McBrien robert hugh benson sacraments Samuel science scientism Sears Tower September 11th sex abuse sexuality Shari’a Law Simon Cowell spiritual St. Irenaeus St. John St. Patrick St. Thomas Aquinas St. Thomas More Superman Ted Kennedy The Hunger Games The Ides of March the shack The Stoning of Soraya M. theologian Time Magazine Timothy Dolan tolerance True Grit Twilight vampires Vatican Willis Tower Woody Allen World War Z World Youth Day YouTube

Syndication

RSS
WORD ON FIRE CATHOLIC MINISTRIES | 5215 Old Orchard Road Suite 410 | Skokie, IL 60077
Add to DeliciousAdd to DiggAdd to NewsvineAdd to RedditAdd to Yahoo MyWebAdd to FarkAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to StumbleUponAdd to Google BookmarksAdd to MySpace
Copyright © 2010 WordOnFire.org